Efficacy data for 2L aRCC CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) monotherapy
On This Page:
The only single-agent TKI with superior OS, PFS, and ORR in 2L aRCC1*
*After at least 1 prior anti-angiogenic therapy.1
METEOR was a phase 3, randomized, open-label trial vs everolimus in aRCC (N=658).1,2
|
1:1 randomization |
|
|---|---|
|
CABOMETYX 60 mg QD |
everolimus 10 mg QD |
|
Treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity† |
|
|
Primary endpoint |
Secondary endpoints |
|
The METEOR trial allowed for enrollment of patients who received prior IO therapy. |
|
- †
-
Tumor assessments were conducted every 8 weeks for the first 12 months, then every 12 weeks thereafter, per RECIST v1.1. Treatment was continued after disease progression at the discretion of the investigator.
- ‡
-
The primary PFS analysis was conducted in the first 375 subjects randomized to treatment. The ITT population included all 658 patients.
Inclusion criteria1,3,4:
- Clear-cell component
- Measurable disease, as defined by RECIST v1.1
- Radiographic progression within 6 months of enrollment
- Radiographic progression during treatment with a VEGFR-TKI or within 6 months of last dose
- No limit to the number of prior therapies
- Prior treatment with antibodies targeting PD-1/PD-L1/L2 allowed
- Brain metastases allowed, if adequately treated and stable
- Karnofsky performance status ≥70%
Prespecified stratification1,4:
- MSKCC risk groups: favorable, intermediate, poor
- Number of prior VEGFR-TKIs: 1, ≥2
Baseline characteristics
METEOR evaluated a broad range of patients who had received prior therapy, including prior immunotherapy.
Baseline Patient Characteristics
|
No. (%) |
|||
|
CABOMETYX |
everolimus |
||
|
Age (years) |
|||
|
Median (IQR) |
63 (56-68) |
62 (55-68) |
|
|
Sex |
|||
|
Male |
253 (77) |
241 (73) |
|
|
Female |
77 (23) |
86 (26) |
|
|
Geographic region |
|||
|
Europe |
167 (51) |
153 (47) |
|
|
North America |
118 (36) |
122 (37) |
|
|
Asia-Pacific |
39 (12) |
47 (14) |
|
|
Latin America |
6 (2) |
6 (2) |
|
|
Race |
|||
|
White |
269 (82) |
263 (80) |
|
|
Asian |
21 (6) |
26 (8) |
|
|
Black |
6 (2) |
3 (<1) |
|
|
Other |
19 (6) |
13 (4) |
|
|
Not reported |
15 (5) |
22 (7) |
|
|
ECOG PS |
|||
|
0 |
226 (68) |
217 (66) |
|
|
1 |
104 (32) |
111 (34) |
|
|
MSKCC prognostic risk category |
|||
|
Favorable |
150 (45) |
150 (46) |
|
|
Intermediate |
139 (42) |
135 (41) |
|
|
Poor |
41 (12) |
43 (13) |
|
|
Metastatic site per IRRC |
|||
|
Lung |
204 (62) |
212 (65) |
|
|
Liver |
88 (27) |
103 (31) |
|
|
Bone |
77 (23) |
65 (20) |
|
|
Lymph node |
206 (62) |
199 (61) |
|
|
Brain |
2 (<1) |
1 (<1) |
|
|
Other |
23 (7) |
21 (6) |
|
|
Previous VEGFR-TKIs |
|||
|
1 |
235 (71) |
229 (70) |
|
|
≥2 |
95 (29) |
99 (30) |
|
|
Previous systemic therapy |
|||
|
Sunitib |
210 (64) |
205 (62) |
|
|
Pazapanib |
144 (44) |
136 (41) |
|
|
Axitinib |
52 (16) |
55 (17) |
|
|
Sorafonib |
21 (6) |
31 (9) |
|
|
Bevacizumab |
5 (2) |
11 (3) |
|
|
Interleukin 2 |
20 (6) |
29 (9) |
|
|
Interferon a |
19 (6) |
24 (7) |
|
|
Nivolumab§ |
17 (5) |
14 (4) |
|
|
Radiotherapy |
110 (33) |
108 (33) |
|
|
Nephrectomy |
283 (86) |
279 (85) |
|
- §
-
One additional patient in the cabozantinib group received prior atezolizumab.
Data are n (%) or median (IQR).
METEOR study efficacy data
Secondary endpoint in METEOR: Median OS1
21.4
months
CABOMETYX
(n=330)
16.5
months
everolimus
(n=328)
HR=0.66 (95% CI: 0.53-0.83) P=0.0003
Primary endpoint in METEOR: Median PFS||¶
7.4
months
CABOMETYX
(n=187)
3.8
months
everolimus
(n=188)
HR=0.58 (95% CI: 0.45-0.74); P<0.0001
- ||
-
In the METEOR trial, the primary PFS analysis was conducted in the first 375 subjects randomized to treatment.
- ¶
-
PFS was confirmed by blinded IRRC.
Secondary endpoint in METEOR: ORR**
17%
CABOMETYX
(n=330)
(95% CI: 13.0%-22.0%)
3%
everolimus
(n=328)
(95% CI: 2.0%-6.0%)
(P<0.0001); partial responses only
**ORR was assessed by blinded IRRC using RECIST v1.1.
OTHER RECOMMENDED OPTION†† IN 2L CLEAR-CELL RCC5
Regardless of prior IO therapy status, cabozantinib is a recommended option.
††NCCN Category 2A: Based upon lower-level evidence, there is uniform NCCN consensus (≥85% support of the Panel) that the intervention is appropriate.
2L=second-line; aRCC=advanced renal cell carcinoma; CI=confidence interval; ECOG PS=Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HR=hazard ratio; IO=immuno-oncology; IQR=interquartile range; IRRC=independent radiology review committee; ITT=intent to treat; MSKCC=Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center; NCCN=National Comprehensive Cancer Network; ORR=objective response rate; OS=overall survival; PD-1=programmed cell death protein-1; PD-L1/L2=programmed death ligand-1/2; PFS=progression-free survival; QD=once daily; RECIST=Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; TKI=tyrosine kinase inhibitor; VEGFR=vascular endothelial growth factor receptor.
References:
- CABOMETYX® (cabozantinib) Prescribing Information. Exelixis, Inc.
- Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17(7):917-927. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30107-3.
- Heng DYC, Xie W, Regan MM, et al. Prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with vascular endothelial growth factor–targeted agents: results from a large, multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(34):5794-5799.
- Data on file. Exelixis, Inc.
- Referenced with permission from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®) for Kidney Cancer V.1.2026. © National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. 2025. All rights reserved. Accessed July 24, 2025. To view the most recent and complete version of the guideline, go online to NCCN.org.